Your basket is currently empty!
» Kidney Cancer News » CheckMate data support 1st nivo–cabo in advanced RCC
CheckMate data support 1st nivo–cabo in advanced RCC
CheckMate 9ER HRQoL data support first-line nivolumab–cabozantinib in advanced RCC
People receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) report less decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during treatment than those given sunitinib, show data from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial.
The primary analysis of the study showed that first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) relative to sunitinib.
When taken together with the current analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), David Cella (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and co-investigators say that the data “further support the use of nivolumab plus cabozantinib over sunitinib.”
The study included 651 individuals with treatment-naïve advanced RCC with a clear-cell component who were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks plus cabozantinib 40 mg daily (n=323), or to receive sunitinib 50 mg daily for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles (n=328).
At baseline, the patient-reported symptom burden was low in both groups, with mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) disease-related symptoms version 1 scores of 30.24 and 30.06 points in the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively.
The researchers report in The Lancet Oncology that, during a median 23.5 months of follow-up, “patients receiving combination nivolumab plus cabozantinib treatment experienced maintenance or improvement in PRO scores, while those receiving sunitinib experienced a decline.”
The least-squares mean change from baseline for nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib was 2.38 points for FKSI-19 total score and 1.33 points for FKSI-19 disease-related symptoms version 1. The difference was 3.48 points for the three-level EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ-5D-3L VAS), which describes global health status, and 0.04 points for the EQ-5D-3L UK utility index, which assesses the societal value of a respondent’s health state. In all cases, the differences were nominally significant in favor of the combination therapy.
Cella and team also found that the median time to first deterioration in FKSI-19 total score was significantly longer with nivolumab plus cabozantinib than with sunitinib, at 6.24 versus 3.48 months, as was the time to first deterioration of EQ-5D-3L VAS (13.86 vs 4.67 months).
The investigators note that fatigue, pain, weight loss, appetite, and sleep-related symptoms were the biggest contributors to deterioration in PROs in post-hoc analyses.
“With the advent of multiple efficacious options for renal cell carcinoma, selecting the optimal first-line therapy can be challenging,” Cella et al remark.”
The primary analysis of the study showed that first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) relative to sunitinib.
When taken together with the current analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), David Cella (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and co-investigators say that the data “further support the use of nivolumab plus cabozantinib over sunitinib.”
The study included 651 individuals with treatment-naïve advanced RCC with a clear-cell component who were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks plus cabozantinib 40 mg daily (n=323), or to receive sunitinib 50 mg daily for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles (n=328).
At baseline, the patient-reported symptom burden was low in both groups, with mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) disease-related symptoms version 1 scores of 30.24 and 30.06 points in the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively.
The researchers report in The Lancet Oncology that, during a median 23.5 months of follow-up, “patients receiving combination nivolumab plus cabozantinib treatment experienced maintenance or improvement in PRO scores, while those receiving sunitinib experienced a decline.”
The least-squares mean change from baseline for nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib was 2.38 points for FKSI-19 total score and 1.33 points for FKSI-19 disease-related symptoms version 1. The difference was 3.48 points for the three-level EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ-5D-3L VAS), which describes global health status, and 0.04 points for the EQ-5D-3L UK utility index, which assesses the societal value of a respondent’s health state. In all cases, the differences were nominally significant in favor of the combination therapy.
Cella and team also found that the median time to first deterioration in FKSI-19 total score was significantly longer with nivolumab plus cabozantinib than with sunitinib, at 6.24 versus 3.48 months, as was the time to first deterioration of EQ-5D-3L VAS (13.86 vs 4.67 months).
The investigators note that fatigue, pain, weight loss, appetite, and sleep-related symptoms were the biggest contributors to deterioration in PROs in post-hoc analyses.
“With the advent of multiple efficacious options for renal cell carcinoma, selecting the optimal first-line therapy can be challenging,” Cella et al remark.”
Read the full article here at MediaWireNews.com
Malcolm Packer
Malcolm is Chief Executive Officer at Kidney Cancer UK and Kidney Cancer Scotland and has worked with the charity in various capacities for over 15 years.